0020
다음 글의 내용과 일치하지 않는 것은?
As part of a drug interdiction effort, Broward County Sheriff's Department officers routinely board buses at scheduled stops and ask passengers for permission to search their luggage. Two officers boarded respondent Bostick's bus and, without articulable suspicion, questioned him and requested his consent to search his luggage for drugs, advising him of his right to refuse. He gave his permission, and the officers, after finding cocaine, arrested Bostick on drug trafficking charges. His motion to suppress the cocaine on the ground that it had been seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment was denied by the trial court. The Florida Court of Appeal affirmed, but certified a question to the State Supreme Court. That court, reasoning that a reasonable passenger would not have felt free to leave the bus to avoid questioning by the police, adopted a per se rule that the sheriff's practice of "working the buses" is unconstitutional.
*articulable 분명한, 명확한
**per se rule 일반적인 규칙
① Broward County Sheriff의 경찰은 버스에 탑승하여 수하물 검사를 요구할 수 있다.
② 피고인 Bostick의 버스에 2명의 경찰관이 탑승했다.
③ 경찰관은 Bostick의 버스에서 코카인을 발견했다.
④ 미연방헌법수정조항 4조를 위반한 상태로 코카인이 압수되었다.
⑤ Florida 법원은 위 사건을 기각했다.
정답 : ⑤